On a Party-Line Vote, the House Passes the No | Political News

The House of Representatives has succeeded in proscribing district courtroom judges like James Boasberg from utilizing their powers to concern nationwide injunctions towards President Trump’s insurance policies. 

Obviously the vote was cut up alongside occasion traces, with one Republican becoming a member of the Democrats in voting “NO.”

The House on Wednesday handed a invoice proscribing district courtroom judges from issuing nationwide injunctions in a transfer that may vastly diminish the potential of courts to dam President Trump’s insurance policies. 

Dubbed the No Rogue Rulings Act, the laws from Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) would restrict judges to offering reduction solely to events instantly concerned in the go well with. 

The invoice handed in an 219-213 vote.

It would bar district courtroom judges from issuing nationwide injunctions, even when the matter has an affect throughout the nation – undercutting quite a few lawsuits difficult Trump’s directives.

“Since President Trump has returned to office, left-leaning activists have cooperated with ideological judges who they have sought out to take their cases and weaponize nationwide injunctions to stall dozens of lawful executive actions and initiatives,” Issa mentioned.

“These sweeping injunctions represent judicial activism at the worst.”

House passes the No Rogue Rulings Act . Final vote was 219-213

Rep Mike Turner was the sole GOP no vote

— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) April 10, 2025

Rep. Turner is a 14-term Congressman in a pretty secure Ohio district, so it seems he determined this laws was a bridge too far. 

In February 2024, Turner got here below fire from his occasion on account of a assertion he issued whereas in his position as the House Intelligence Chairman. Turner claimed there was a “severe national security risk,” but failed to run it by House Speaker Mike Johnson before going on national television to spout off. In January 2025, after Johnson was once again voted in as Speaker of the House, he removed Turner as Chairman of House Intel. 

It has been reported that Turner is a [Kevin ] “McCarthy man,” and that he was bullish on not making any changes to FISA. Word on the street is that he is much too cozy with the intelligence community to be an objective voice on oversight.

Turner’s “NO” vote is raising calls from Republicans and MAGA to have him primaried. The Democrats have also targeted Turner and two other Republican representatives as potential seat flips for 2026.

.@DCCC is focusing on 3 Ohio GOP Reps for defeat in 2026

• Max Miller #OH07
• Mike Turner #OH10
• Mike Carey #OH15

These reps don’t respond to calls or emails from constituents so maybe try their chiefs of staff (post below)

Complete DCCC 🎯 list below

— 𝙻𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚢 𝚃𝚎𝚗𝚗𝚎𝚢 (@LarryTenney) April 8, 2025

Good luck with that. Thanks to the wins in Florida, Republicans may afford a one-vote departure. However, consideration is now on the Budget Resolution and whether or not Turner will even select to fall consistent with the occasion or be a dissenting vote.

In the meantime, the Senate has submitted a comparable invoice to rein in rogue judges.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) has launched a comparable invoice in the Senate that may additionally restrict judicial rulings to the events instantly concerned in the case. It’s unclear, nevertheless, when the laws may advance.

 This profitable vote on the No Rogue Rulings Act is one of the more important features made by Congress to help guarantee President Trump’s polices and agenda transfer ahead.