Californias War on Families Rages on — Now Your

California is many issues, a lot of them not so great in trendy occasions under the regime of extremist Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Democrat machine that has run both chambers of the legislature for the last 15 years.

One factor they don’t seem to be, however, is pleasant to nuclear households. Newsom, Attorney General Rob Bonta, and the wild-eyed lawmakers in Sacramento are continually pushing issues like boys in girls’s sports activities, colleges holding college students’ gender transitions secret, and principally attempting to take away parental affect as a lot as doable. They evidently subscribe to Hillary Clinton’s concept that it “takes a village” to raise a little one — and it doesn’t matter if the organic mother and father are half of that village.

To wit, your youngsters might soon merely divorce you in the Golden State if they don’t such as you. 

Maybe you’re an evil conservative, or possibly you need to discuss to your 6’ 2” son about his selection to put on lipstick and clothes, or possibly you need your darling daughter to stop taking medicine. Whatever the battle is, the child might just say “kiss off” and be accomplished with you ceaselessly, if Democrat legislator Rick Zbur will get his manner.

Assembly Bill 1967 is transferring through the California Legislature with barely a ripple of public consideration. The invoice, authored by LGBTQ rights activist-turned-Assemblymember Rick Zbur, would enable youngsters of any age to provoke state dependency proceedings against their own mother and father. The mother and father won’t even know this has occurred until the die is already solid.

The invoice permits any minor residing in any residential facility to file a legal utility against their mother and father, without trigger or evidence of hurt.

Women Are Real (@WomenAreReals), a web site and social media account that advocates for single-sex areas like locker rooms (“Women will not be erased in language or in law,” they write), level out what they suppose is the real intent of the proposed invoice:

Scorching testimony by @JenRevere on California’s latest assault on parental rights.

AB 1967 permits a little one of any age, positioned by her mother and father in a secure residential facility, to secretly file an utility to depart that facility and change into a ward of the state.

“Facility”… pic.twitter.com/sKF1fpJa5E

— WomenAreReal (@WomenAreReals) June 18, 2026

Scorching testimony by [parents’ rights attorney] @JenRevere on California’s latest assault on parental rights.

AB 1967 permits a little one of any age, positioned by her mother and father in a secure residential facility, to secretly file an utility to depart that facility and change into a ward of the state.

“Facility” contains drug rehab, faith-based packages, wilderness therapy, and even some boarding colleges.

Imagine your drug-addicted 14-year-old is finally in treatment. Under AB 1967, he can secretly file to get out.

Just because.

But the real objective of this invoice is eradicating youngsters from mother and father who refuse to “affirm” a little one’s cross-sex identification. 

@AsmRickZbur provides away the sport in his response. ⬇️

Here is that unconvincing response:

Author of AB 1967 @AsmRickZbur responds to @JenRevere’s testimony with: “That’s just not the case.” But anybody can read the invoice and resolve for your self who is telling the reality.

Then Zbur immediately provides away the sport by invoking the “LGBTQ child.” A phrase that ought to make… pic.twitter.com/JqUzpHJ8ap

— WomenAreReal (@WomenAreReals) June 18, 2026

Author of AB 1967 @AsmRickZbur responds to @JenRevere’s testimony with: “That’s just not the case.” But anybody can read the invoice and resolve for your self who is telling the reality.

Then Zbur immediately provides away the sport by invoking the “LGBTQ child.” A phrase that ought to make every grownup’s blood run cold. Children are usually not mini-adults with fixed inappropriate identities.

This invoice is written broadly, but the political objective is apparent. Activists want to create a pathway for youngsters to escape mother and father who refuse to affirm a cross-sex identification.

MORE: Huge: Judge Delivers Major Blow to CA’s Anti-Parent Regime, Rules ‘Lying Teacher’ Law Unconstitutional

A Tale of Two States: AZ Now Bans Boys in Girls’ Sports, CA Caves to Chaos (VIP)

The particulars in the invoice are chilling, according to The Post Millennial:

Residential amenities embody drug rehabilitation packages, boarding colleges, wilderness therapy packages, faith-based residential packages, and runaway shelters. It doesn’t matter whether or not the power is secure and an acceptable placement chosen by the mother and father. The little one can petition the court to strip the mother and father of custodial authority and substitute county little one welfare control or foster placement. The utility need not be corroborated by any grownup and need not be served on the mother and father. The little one’s assertion alone is adequate to set off a necessary evaluation of the mother and father’ home. This evaluation can happen without the mother and father’ information.

For many far-left California lawmakers, they’d love to do away with mother and father altogether and let the NGOs with fats taxpayer-funded bank accounts and the all-powerful unions raise the children.

Hillary was just a little off: it doesn’t take a village, it takes a socialist state. 

Editor’s Note: President Trump is preventing to guarantee America’s youngsters get the schooling they deserve.

Help us combat back against Big Government waste and restore energy to the states. Join CrimsonState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to obtain 60% off your membership.