Federal Appeals Court Throws a Wrench Into Trumps

President Trump’s plans for a grand White House ballroom just hit another snag on Friday as the D. C. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a preliminary injunction blocking construction of the proposed addition.

🚨 In a 2-1 vote, the D.C. Circuit blocked President Trump’s plan to construct a new White House ballroom, ruling the administration probably can not demolish the East Wing and start above-ground construction without authorization from Congress. pic.twitter.com/islwZwWsco

— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) August 7, 2026

In a nutshell, the appellate court held that Congress — not the President — controls major structural adjustments to the White House.

As readers could recall, President Trump announced plans in July 2025 to construct a 90,000-square-foot ballroom in place of the East Wing. The ballroom was to be funded by personal donations quite than taxpayer {dollars}. The new ballroom was meant to better accommodate large White House features and to present added security options. 

But the National Trust for Historic Preservation sued to block the transfer — after demolition had already begun. D.C. District Judge Richard Leon issued a preliminary injunction blocking half of the project — his order halted above-ground construction while permitting work mandatory for White House security to continue.

In affirming Leon’s injunction, the Court of Appeals maintained that its choice is not about whether or not or not a new ballroom is a good thought. Instead, the Court emphasised that:

• The White House belongs to the American people.
• Presidents live there quickly.
• Congress has long exercised authority over major White House construction initiatives.
• The Constitution offers Congress broad authority over federal property.
• Congress has repeatedly appropriated money for White House additions, renovations, and repairs throughout historical past, which the bulk considered as evidence that major White House construction has historically required congressional involvement.
• The court discovered no law giving the President unilateral authority to demolish the East Wing and change it with a ballroom funded by personal donations. 

Again, the bulk’s choice is just not about whether or not the ballroom is nice or dangerous coverage, nor does it maintain that the ballroom can never be constructed. It merely held that, absent congressional authorization, construction can not proceed while the case is litigated.

The choice was 2-1, with Judges Patricia Millet (Obama) and Brad Garcia (Biden) in the bulk, and Judge Neomi Rao (Trump) authoring a 34-page dissent. In her dissent, Rao contends that the injunction offers too little deference to the Executive on national security wants at the White House. Rao would have allowed construction to proceed while the case is being litigated.

Bear in thoughts, this is just not the ultimate say on this issue. The D.C. Circuit stayed its own choice for 14 days to enable the administration to search Supreme Court review, which it virtually actually will. 

The backside line right here is that, for the appellate court, the dispute right here is not about structure, but quite who will get to resolve. 

Editor’s Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump’s agenda and insulting the need of the people.

Help us expose out-of-control judges useless set on halting President Trump’s mandate for change. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to obtain 60% off your membership.