Democrats Are Hopping Mad After SCOTUS Allows

CrimsonState wrote on Friday evening about SCOTUS giving a slight breather to the Trump administration on the postponement of SNAP benefit funds, with a late night order, while the first Circuit makes its deliberations on the case. And you could be unsurprised to study the Democrats are making their emotions identified about the entire scenario. 

Another approach of placing it–they’re hopping mad. I’ll swing around to that in a minute. First, to make sense of it, discover below my piece on the Supreme Court keep in the SNAP case, written by Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, late last evening.

In the meantime, my colleague streiff had motive to call shenanigans on the Dems earlier on Saturday, since the order by the high court did not stop over a dozen blue states from doling out full funds to SNAP beneficiaries beginning on Friday.

SEE: UPDATED: Supreme Court Issues Stay in Response to Trump Admin Emergency Appeal of SNAP Case

Shenanigans! Over a Dozen States Outmaneuver the Supreme Court and Take Full SNAP Money Anyway

Democrats being Democrats, they’ve sprung forth in the wake of the Court’s keep, unsurprisingly. Here’s just a sampling of their indicators of rage. First, in line with streiff’s story, Massachusetts’ Governor Martha Healy (D) was one of the blue state executives who labored to siphon all the food help money despite the SCOTUS keep, in a post on her official X account.

…[Gov. Healey] announced Friday that SNAP recipients in the Bay State might start receiving their full advantages as early as Saturday. On Saturday morning, she said that the deliberate funds for households who went without earlier advantages had been efficiently despatched out but that officers are reviewing what the latest pause means for recipients anticipating advantages next week.

The governor wrung out every fear-mongering alternative with her message, including, “President Trump’s cruelty knows no bounds,” and “President Trump needs to stop playing politics with people’s lives and pay full SNAP benefits for everyone.”

Now, I’ll have missed one thing in a change to our kind of authorities, but would not that sound like an edict only a king might make? Oh, irony.

NY’s Governor Kathy Hochul (D) also despatched out the checks as normal, then did one thing of a freak-out on social media, writing on X that “[Pres.] Trump fought for this. He doesn’t care if millions of Americans go hungry.”

Next, we see Dem management in the shape of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY-8) attempting to use the choice as a approach of extending the Schumer Shutdown for no real motive. Referring to Republicans and/or the Trump administration as “extremists,” he wrote on X:

The Trump administration is begging the Supreme Court to block an order requiring them to immediately release SNAP advantages. Meanwhile. Millions of hungry Americans are at risk of ravenous. These extremists are sick people.

Well, on second thought, the leftists might need a motive relating to insurance coverage firms and Obamacare–but not a good one, as we wrote.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), ever the fabulist, in contrast the shutdown he helped create to a nuclear explosion in his missive–then went in on the SCOTUS keep:

The blast radius of the Republican shutdown grows even bigger

This morning, tens of hundreds of thousands of Americans stay in limbo as the Trump admin continues its campaign against SNAP

For Trump to go all the best way to the Supreme Court just to get out of having to pay SNAP advantages is…

— Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer) November 8, 2025

Then there was everybody’s favourite Democrat whom they love to hate, Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA):

The Trump Administration will go to any size — including appeal to the very best court in the land — if it means they’ll cut off food for hungry people.

What is incorrect with them? pic.twitter.com/iZSwTBfpLe

— Adam Schiff (@SenAdamSchiff) November 8, 2025

In case you possibly can’t see the post, it reads:

The Trump Administration will go to any size — including appeal to the very best court in the land — if it means they’ll cut off food for hungry people. 

What is incorrect with them?

We would possibly effectively ask the senator the same query about himself and his colleagues. Fourteen occasions in a row, most of the Democrats in the U.S. Senate have voted to keep the federal authorities closed. And only two in the House voted for the persevering with decision in the House. That’s the only motive why SNAP just isn’t in a position to perform as normal, and that’s why Speaker Mike Johnson can not swear-in a new member of Congress.

And yes, Democrats, that is why the Affordable Care Act stays as damaged as it has always been. Once we are able to end the shutdown, some of those issues could be fixed or introduced back online. The Democrats are proper about one factor; this just isn’t regular. They’re just mistaken about where the answer lies.

Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is right here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the unconventional Democrats compelled a authorities shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the reality about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.