ICE Torches Media Outlet That Tried to Gin Up

David J. Venturella, the performing director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), has come out swinging against a media report that “mischaracterized” the company’s coverage on officer-worn physique cameras. 

At the center of the matter is an article printed by the AP on Friday with the title, “ICE will release body camera video only when seen in the agency’s ‘best interests,’ policy says.” The writer of the article, one Ryan J. Foley, explained to readers that ICE would cherry-pick which videos had been fast-tracked for release to the public, the subtext being that the company would conceal something that may make them look dangerous.

Here’s Foley:

The coverage says ICE will promptly release video of shootings and other encounters in which its brokers trigger death or severe injury only after figuring out “it is in the best interests of the agency” to do so. That provides its director discretion to release recordings that mirror nicely on the company’s image while working to keep others secret, consultants on physique digicam insurance policies said.

This, Venturella said in a Saturday assertion, is “yet another misleading and sensationalized Associated Press report about ICE operations and policy.” He continued, “The AP fundamentally mischaracterized ICE’s body-worn camera policy by conflating the expedited release of footage following a serious bodily injury or death in custody with ICE’s broader authority to release body-worn camera footage. Those are distinct issues, and here is the truth: ICE policy permits expedited release when appropriate — and clarifies that it’s not appropriate to release footage when doing so could compromise investigations or privacy.”

The performing ICE director made a level of noting that its method to releasing bodycam footage “mirrors other federal law enforcement agencies’ policies and is fully consistent with the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act.”

Acting ICE Director David J. Venturella points assertion on mischaracterization of ICE’s body-worn digicam coverage. pic.twitter.com/fTJo8RZ9Sk

— U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (@ICEgov) August 8, 2026

“It’s disappointing, though not surprising, to see yet another misleading and sensationalized Associated Press report about ICE operations and policy. The AP fundamentally mischaracterized ICE’s body-worn camera policy by conflating the expedited release of footage following a serious bodily injury or death in custody with ICE’s broader authority to release body-worn camera footage. Those are distinct issues, and here is the truth: ICE policy permits expedited release when appropriate — and clarifies that it’s not appropriate to release footage when doing so could compromise investigations or privacy. This approach mirrors other federal law enforcement agencies’ policies and is fully consistent with the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act. At the same time, we’re committed to transparency and accountability, and we’re on track to equip every officer and agent in the field with body-worn cameras by the end of August, ahead of our original timeline.”

Venturella also revealed that every ICE agent and officer can be issued bodycam gear by the end of August. As RedState reported in July, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that the Trump administration was working to quickly roll out bodycams to all ICE subject places of work.

Leavitt revealed, “Over half of all ICE field offices now do have body cameras, and the remainder of the field offices are expected within 60 days.” The roll out course of to get bodycams to all ICE subject places of work was slowed, Leavitt famous, by the Democrats, who shut down DHS for a number of weeks.

The humorous factor about all of this is that the AP and other ICE critics appear to anticipate bodycam footage to yield a regular stream of damning evidence against federal brokers, notably after the lethal encounters in Minneapolis earlier this 12 months. But physique cameras have a humorous means of including context that viral clips and overwrought media reviews omit. Once every ICE agent is sporting one, the public could wind up seeing a lot more suspects resisting, obstructing, threatening, or in any other case escalating encounters. 

Critics who are clamoring for the video footage ought to most likely put together themselves for the chance that those cameras will exonerate brokers far more often than they incriminate them.

Editor’s Note: Democrat politicians and their radical supporters will do the whole lot they will to intervene with and threaten ICE brokers imposing our immigration legal guidelines.

Help us maintain these leftists accountable and expose their obstruction. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to obtain 60% off your membership.