It could kill us all | Latest Tech News
A former Google DeepMind researcher has warned that artificial intelligence could “kill us all” — including to a growing refrain of insiders sounding alarms about a technology that President Trump has dismissed as a doomsday “hoax.”
Bilal Chughtai, who not too long ago resigned from the Google-owned AI lab after working on AGI security and alignment, said Monday that he had turn into deeply anxious about the direction of the technology after watching its fast development firsthand.
“I earnestly believe that AI has the potential to kill us all, and that we might be running out of time to avoid this outcome,” Chughtai wrote in posts on X and LinkedIn.
Bilal Chughtai, a former Google DeepMind staffer, is seen in an undated picture. X/@bilalchughtai_
Chughtai said the tempo of progress since he entered the sector in early 2022 has been “staggering,” pointing to more and more autonomous AI brokers as evidence that builders could soon face systems they can not reliably control.
“I think it’s possible that the AI companies might, in the next few years, succeed in building superintelligent AI systems that far exceed human capabilities in every domain,” he wrote.
Chughtai said he was “not confident” that such systems would behave as people intend, warning that misaligned AI could escape human control and take actions ensuing in “the permanent disempowerment or death of humanity.”
“Alignment is the problem of preventing this, and is both difficult and unsolved,” he wrote.
“Our present understanding of how to train AI systems that deeply want what we want is extremely rudimentary.”
Chughtai however said he believes AI can still be developed safely — but only if tech companies pull back from what he described as a “manic race” to construct ever-more-powerful systems.
A scene from “Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines” in 2003. AI researchers are warning that the technology could pose a risk to the human race. Warner Bros/Courtesy Everett Collection
“We need to pace AI development to a speed that society can handle, where emerging risks can be addressed before extreme harm is realized,” he wrote.
Chughtai has since joined BlueDot Impact, a nonprofit that trains people to work on AI security, according to Bloomberg.
His warning comes just days after Jacob Coxon, a former researcher at Anthropic and OpenAI, give up and accused the businesses developing the technology of “gambling with our lives.”
“The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade,” Coxon wrote in a post on X.
The issues have spilled into the industry’s government suites.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei joined the push over the weekend, urging the industry to put the brakes on its most {powerful} AI fashions — with OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Elon Musk publicly backing his call.
Jacob Coxon, a researcher who departed his AI function at Anthropic over fears of racing into extinction, says people are “begging” for regulation. Fox News
Amodei has argued that coordinating such a slowdown will probably be tough because the incentives to race forward — including the potential army benefit — are so great.
“I think that’s going to be very difficult because the incentives to pull ahead and the military advantage that you get from that are so large,” Amodei told CBS News’ “Sunday Morning.”
“And honestly, I don’t know if it’s possible, but we should try.”
Trump, however, sharply rejected the warnings Monday, calling fears that AI could destroy humanity a “HOAX” and alleging a “SICK conspiracy” against AI and data facilities that would benefit China.
Trump dismissed the push for stronger regulation while emphasizing the strategic significance of sustaining the US lead in AI.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman had been featured on The Post cowl after backing calls to slow the development of superior artificial intelligence over security issues.
“The only control or ‘guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, according to studies.
The president also singled out Amodei, accusing the Anthropic chief of pretending to be a “perfect little angel” while arguing that the federal authorities already has ample felony and regulatory powers over AI firms.
The Post reported Monday that the White House however has been contemplating “limited safeguards” for AI even as the administration rejects a broader regulatory crackdown.
“They might agree to some limited safeguards but that would be the outer limits for the administration,” one top Wall Street government with data of the administration’s considering told The Post.
The administration is instead leaning toward industry self-regulation and other narrowly tailor-made guardrails, according to The Post’s reporting — reflecting its concern that more sweeping restrictions could hand an benefit to China.
The Post has sought remark from Google.
Stay informed with the latest in tech! Our web site is your trusted source for breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, gadget launches, software program updates, cybersecurity, and digital innovation.
For contemporary insights, skilled coverage, and trending tech updates, go to us recurrently by clicking right here.
