MAGA Civil War Coverage vs. Democratic Meltdown

The mainstream media has discovered a new favourite narrative for 2025: the “MAGA civil war.” Turn on any cable news community, open any political publication, and you’ll discover breathless coverage of disputes within Trump’s coalition over H-1B visas, overseas coverage priorities, and who belongs under the MAGA tent. 

Just this morning, Axios had a piece out about the hunt “for vacation unity amid [a] widening civil warfare.” With all the drama in regards to the shutdown, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and other Republican points, most media retailers are hyperfixating on all the preventing in the Republican Party.

And that’s not to say that the coverage is fallacious, either. These disputes are real and important points the GOP has to work through during this midterm cycle if they need to keep in energy. But what’s telling about the media’s bias is often as a lot as what will get ignored versus what will get lined. While journalists obsess over every MAGA skirmish, there may be absolute mayhem consuming the Democratic Party.

READ MORE: Hakeem Jeffries Takes Hard ‘L’ After Yet Another ‘Dems in Disarray’ Moment Plays Out on House Floor

Every disagreement between different components of the Trump coalition has obtained a number of headlines and hours, if not days, of top billing during news programming. Every Democratic dispute appears to have come and gone as rapidly as it appeared.

Democratic Dysfunction Gets a Pass

Consider what’s truly taking place inside the Democratic Party proper now:

The Shutdown Debacle: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer orchestrated a authorities shutdown strategy in November that spectacularly backfired when eight Democratic senators broke ranks to vote with Republicans. The ensuing fury from the Democratic base and questions about Schumer’s management turned so intense that New York politicians are already discussing who would possibly major him in 2028.

Internal occasion sources told GWN that Schumer was “angry at how much he’s being blamed” by senators they think about “disloyal.” 

Translation: the Democratic caucus is at warfare with itself, and its chief is shedding control. Did this get the multi-day, all-hands-on-deck coverage treatment? Did pundits declare a “Democratic civil war”?

The Centrist-Progressive Split: A complete report from the center-left Welcome group, shared with Semafor in October, concluded that progressive rhetoric and insurance policies have “badly weakened” the Democratic Party, inflicting it to lose ground with every demographic group besides white liberals.

The report called for Democrats to “break with unpopular party orthodoxies” and return to Obama-era positioning on immigration and crime. Progressive teams immediately pushed back, arguing Democrats need to double down on left-wing framing, not abandon it. It’s a basic battle over the occasion’s id, values, and electoral strategy going into 2026 and 2028. But where had been the wall-to-wall panels discussing whether or not Democrats can survive this ideological cut up?

DNC Leadership Chaos: The Democratic National Committee’s summer time assembly in Minneapolis devolved into public disputes over Israel coverage, with competing resolutions creating such division that Chair Ken Martin had to withdraw his own proposal and create a job pressure instead.

Party members brazenly fought over whether or not Democrats had been bringing “a pencil to a knife fight” or needed to abandon enjoying by the principles fully. Some pushed for utterly new approaches to fundraising and major processes. Yet this precise chaos at a formal occasion assembly obtained a fraction of the coverage that speculative MAGA tensions generate.

The Floor Vote Fiasco: When a more average Democrat, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, compelled a flooring vote condemning fellow Democrat Jesús García for engineering his retirement to benefit his chief of employees, it triggered what Axios called “a rare moment of public infighting” with a “heated exchange” between Gluesenkamp Perez and House Minority Whip Katherine Clark.

Progressive Democrats attacked Gluesenkamp Perez for “going after a strong progressive Latino leader.” The incident uncovered uncooked tensions between the occasion’s centrist and progressive wings at a second when management needed unity. But it obtained one story, possibly two. Then it disappeared from the news cycle.

Why the Double Standard?

The media’s uneven coverage reveals one thing important about how political journalism works in 2025.

MAGA infighting matches established narratives: Trump’s motion is unstable, constructed on character moderately than precept, destined to collapse under its own contradictions. Every dispute turns into evidence supporting this predetermined storyline.

Democratic chaos, by distinction, disrupts the narrative that positions the occasion as the “normal” different to MAGA extremism. Acknowledging Democratic dysfunction would require journalists to grapple with uncomfortable questions about whether or not the opposition occasion has any coherent imaginative and prescient past anti-Trump resistance.

The result’s coverage that amplifies Republican conflicts while minimizing Democratic ones—even when the Democratic disputes contain senior management, basic coverage disagreements, and public shows of inner warfare.

The Stakes Are Actually Higher for Democrats

Here’s what makes the coverage imbalance even more irritating: the Democratic Party’s inner conflicts arguably pose larger questions for American politics than MAGA’s growing pains.

Trump’s motion is debating important points—immigration coverage, overseas intervention, financial nationalism versus free-market ideas. These are respectable ideological tensions within a coalition that controls the White House and both chambers of Congress.

But Democrats are wrestling with one thing more basic: they don’t know what their occasion stands for anymore.

Should they transfer left or heart? Embrace or reject progressive rhetoric on cultural points? Challenge Trump aggressively or search lodging where attainable? Trust their current management or demand wholesale adjustments?

A middle-left group’s report actually concluded that the occasion’s embrace of progressive concepts meant to appeal to non-white voters has instead triggered them to lose ground with those very constituencies. That’s not a tactical disagreement—that’s an admission that core strategic assumptions had been utterly fallacious.

Yet this will get handled as inside-baseball course of stuff while MAGA Twitter feuds dominate headlines. It’s predictable, but no less exhausting.

Editor’s Note: The Democrat Party has never been less widespread as voters reject its globalist agenda.

Help us continue exposing Democrats’ plans to lead America down a harmful path. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.