Supreme Court Will Hear Arguments on Crucial Case

The Supreme Court is scheduled to take up the case relating to birthright citizenship Wednesday morning, and President Donald Trump said from the Oval Office Tuesday that he could be in attendance to pay attention to oral arguments. 

“I’m going,” he told reporters, “because I have listened to this argument for so long.”

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump said he’s GOING to the Supreme Court when they hear the birthright citizenship case tomorrow

Wow!

This might actually be THE most important case in fashionable US historical past—and 47’s taking it critically

No more anchor infants! pic.twitter.com/e5BZZzk0ws

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) March 31, 2026

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed later Tuesday that he did certainly plan on being there as the justices hear arguments over the constitutionality of an govt order he signed on his first day back in workplace in January 2025. Called “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship,” the order sought to end birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. who don’t have at least one parent who is a citizen or permanent legal resident.

The lawsuits immediately flew in, of course, and lower courts predictably ruled that his order was unconstitutional. Trump argues that birthright citizenship has long been misunderstood and that its use today is not at all what the writers of the 14^th Amendment, which codified birthright citizenship, had in thoughts.

‘…I’m going,’ Trump said when a reporter introduced up the case. 

The President said he was attending ‘because I’ve listened to this argument for so long.’ 

‘And this just isn’t about Chinese billionaires who are billionaires from other international locations who all of a sudden have 75 kids, or 59 kids in one case, or 10 kids, turning into American residents,’ Trump argued. ‘This was about slaves.’

Birthright citizenship was established by the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in 1868 to guarantee citizenship to not too long ago freed slaves – but traditionally has utilized to every particular person born in the US or its territories. 

RELATED: To the Surprise of No One, U.S. Catholic Bishops Stake Out a Misguided Position on Birthright Citizenship

A Chinese Billionaire Has Over 100 American Citizen Children, How Is This Even Legal?

Historians say there may be no file of a sitting president ever attending a SCOTUS listening to.

Numerous leftist pundits are accusing the president of making an attempt to bend the idea of separation of powers by utilizing the manager department to intimidate the judicial department. Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Harmeet Dhillon has a message for them: cool your jets.

There’s actually a chair set up at SCOTUS for our presidents to sit in for oral argument. Your separation of powers nonsense is more imitation pearl-clutching hauteur. https://t.co/unVfZPgD9v

— AAGHarmeetDhillon (@AAGDhillon) March 31, 2026

Trump had said that he “might” attend a SCOTUS listening to on tariffs in November ’25, but in the end, he didn’t. It actually could be one thing for the historical past books if he did this time. I just hope for his sake he doesn’t have to pay attention to one of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s diatribes, that are beginning to grow legendary even to her fellow jurists for their size and unusual interpretations of the law.

Good luck, Mr. President.

Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump, unlawful immigration into our great nation has just about stopped. Despite the unconventional left’s lies, new laws wasn’t needed to secure our border, just a new president.

Help us continue to report the reality about the president’s border insurance policies and mass deportations. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.