Cop-physical attacking Driver Now Equals Assassinated | Political News
I’m not sure when Tucker Carlson’s descent into nutbaggery started. I had form of a dim awareness of him when he was the bowtie-wearing man on Fox News, and when that schtick acquired drained, he really hosted his own show for a while, and it wasn’t dangerous. But then Fox defenestrated him, and he went out on his own. He appeared to be retaining it together – for a while.
But now? It appears like he is gone about a half-bubble off plumb, and that’s for sure and for sure. In his latest, he is making an attempt to draw some ethical equivalence between the capturing of an anti-ICE “protester” who practically ran over a cop, and the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Sorry, Tucker, but that’s loopy.
Tucker Carlson compares the death of Renee Nicole Good to the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Good hit a federal law enforcement officer with her car after disobeying orders from authorities to get out of her car because she was impeding law enforcement.
Kirk was assassinated by… pic.twitter.com/IOYQb44iDM
— Ryan Saavedra (@RyanSaavedra) January 11, 2026
Ryan Saavedra’s post is prolonged, but here is the key level:
Tucker Carlson compares the death of Renee Nicole Good to the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Good hit a federal law enforcement officer with her car after disobeying orders from authorities to get out of her car because she was impeding law enforcement.
Kirk was assassinated by a militant leftist because he used phrases to unfold his concepts.
Yes. Tucker, in his assertion reproduced by Mr. Saavedra, writes:
The 37-year-old was an American citizen and reportedly the mom of a kindergarten-aged baby. Did we disagree with her views on immigration? Probably. But that should not matter. Her death is a tragedy, regardless of her partisan affiliations, ideological beliefs, or who pulled the set off. A girl acquired shot in the face.
Yes, Tucker, a girl acquired shot in the face. She would not have gotten shot in the face if she had been waving a signal on the sidewalk. She would not have been shot in the face if she had been at home writing an agitated letter to her political representatives. She would not have gotten shot in the face if she had not tried to impede ICE autos by putting her vehicle and herself in their manner. She would not have gotten shot in the face had she stepped out of the vehicle when the ICE agent, a badged law-enforcement officer conducting his legal obligation, had requested her to. All those selections had been hers, as was the choice to stamp on the gasoline with a LEO standing in entrance of her car. That’s why she acquired shot in the face.
So, when you write this, Tucker, we all know your flip to the darkish facet is full:
How come so few conservatives are viewing this story through a human lens? And why, when one thing comparable, just like the killing of Charlie Kirk, occurs on the other facet, did many on the left have fun because they thought his political views had been incorrect? We have a guess.
The assassination of Charlie Kirk is nothing in any way just like the death of Renee Nicole Good. Not even remotely, other than they both had been killed by bullets. That’s where any similarity ends.
Read More: Watch: Kristi Noem Slams Minneapolis Protests As ‘Domestic violent extremism’
We’re Outta Here! This Federal Agency Just Announced Its Immediate Exit From Minneapolis
Charlie Kirk was seated, speaking with people, in a pavilion set up for the aim. He wasn’t impeding any law enforcement effort in any manner. He wasn’t threatening anybody. The most threatening factor he had on his individual was a microphone and presumably a water bottle. He was assassinated, in a preplanned motion, by a left-wing nutcase who set up his assault in advance. Charlie was killed for being open about his political views, but he sought to persuade, not to intimidate, not to threaten, not to impede or intervene with anybody.
There is no similarity in the 2 circumstances. To declare there’s, is to have interaction in the best denial of actuality since the Democratic National Committee claimed Joe Biden was “sharp as a tack.”
Editor’s Note: Do you take pleasure in RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the nutbar left and their fellow vacationers? Support our work so that we will continue to convey you the reality.
Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to obtain 60% off your membership.
Stay up to date with the latest developments in politics! Our web site is your go-to source for cutting-edge political news, election updates, authorities insurance policies, political events, marketing campaign methods, and insights into laws. We update our content daily to guarantee you’ve access to the freshest info and analysis on voter rights, public opinion, political analysis, election outcomes, political debates, international relations, corruption, activism, and civic engagement.
Explore how these political trends are shaping the future! Visit us recurrently for the most partaking and informative political content by clicking right here. Our rigorously curated articles will keep you informed on grassroots actions, worldwide relations, coverage adjustments, and constitutional points.


