OpenAIs Sam Altman wants to de-escalate Pentagon spat with rival Anthropic | Latest Tech News

OpenAI’s Sam Altman told staffers that he wants to “help de-escalate” the spat between the Pentagon and its chief AI rival Anthropic – which faces being blacklisted after saying it received’t take away navy safeguards forward of a key Friday deadline.

Altman told staffers in a memo late Thursday that OpenAI shares the same security “red lines” as Anthropic – specifically, that its AI instruments shouldn’t be used for mass surveillance of Americans or to energy weapons succesful of firing without human oversight.

OpenAI is in talks with the Pentagon on a potential deal to permit use of its AI fashions in categorized navy settings, according to Altman – who wrote that the discussions had been important to attain a consensus and keep away from setting a harmful industrywide precedent.

CEO Sam Altman told OpenAI staffers that he wants to “help de-escalate” the spat between the Pentagon and Anthropic. AFP via Getty Images

“Regardless of how we got here, this is no longer just an issue between Anthropic and the [Pentagon]; this is an issue for the whole industry and it is important to clarify our stance,” Altman wrote in the memo, according to Axios.

At the same time, Altman prompt that OpenAI might attain common ground with the Pentagon on how fashions ought to be used without violating its purple strains.

“We believe this dispute isn’t about how AI will be used, but about control. We believe that a private US company cannot be more powerful than the democratically-elected US government, although companies can have lots of input and influence. Democracy is messy, but we are committed to it,” Altman wrote.

The Wall Street Journal was first to report on the memo.

Anthropic, whose Claude chatbot is the only model presently used by the US navy in categorized settings, has until 5 pm ET on Friday to take away safeguards. Defense Sec. Pete Hegseth said he’ll either classify Anthropic as a “supply chain risk” or invoke the Defense Production Act to drive it to tailor fashions for miliary use unless it complies.

Altman’s memo surfaced hours after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei that his safety-obsessed firm “cannot in good conscience accede” to the Pentagon’s calls for.

Defense Sec. Hegseth has threatened to label Anthropic a “supply chain risk.” AP

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said the firm “cannot in good conscience” cave to the Pentagon’s demand. REUTERS

Amodei said the Pentagon’s latest offer in tense negotiations “made virtually no progress on preventing Claude’s use for mass surveillance of Americans or in fully autonomous weapons.”

Emil Michael, protection undersecretary for research and engineering, blasted Amodei over the stance, writing on X that the Anthropic boss “has a God-complex” and “wants nothing more than to try to personally control the US Military and is ok putting our nation’s safety at risk.”

OpenAI’s potential intervention comes amid tense relations between Altman and Amodei – who just lately refused to shake fingers on stage during a viral picture op at an AI summit in India.

Earlier this week, a senior Defense official told The Post that Elon Musk’s Grok has acquired approval for use in categorized settings, while OpenAI and Google had been “close.”

Stay informed with the latest in tech! Our web site is your trusted source for breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, gadget launches, software program updates, cybersecurity, and digital innovation.

For contemporary insights, professional coverage, and trending tech updates, go to us recurrently by clicking right here.

Where ChatGPT Health fails — and how it could turn deadly | Latest Tech News

Don’t call it ChatEMT.

OpenAI last month launched ChatGPT Health, a devoted space in ChatGPT that permits customers to ask health questions, analyze their medical information and join to wellness apps.

Now, weeks after its launch, researchers from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai are raising issues that the AI device often fails to advocate pressing care in emergency circumstances and sometimes misses suicide-crisis alerts.

With tens of millions of people asking ChatGPT health questions every day, OpenAI not too long ago launched ChatGPT Health. OpenAI

“ChatGPT Health performed well in textbook emergencies such as stroke or severe allergic reactions,” Dr. Ashwin Ramaswamy, teacher of urology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, said in a assertion.

“But it struggled in more nuanced situations where the danger is not immediately obvious, and those are often the cases where clinical judgment matters most.”

OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, said in January that more than 40 million people use ChatGPT every day to tackle their healthcare issues.

Thus, ChatGPT Health was born — it was initially launched to a small group of customers and piqued the curiosity of Mount Sinai researchers.

“We wanted to answer a very basic but critical question: if someone is experiencing a real medical emergency and turns to ChatGPT Health for help, will it clearly tell them to go to the emergency room?” Ramaswamy said.

For his research, printed this week in Nature Medicine, Ramaswamy‘s staff devised 60 medical eventualities spanning 21 medical specialties.

Each state of affairs was examined 16 occasions, with situations such as race, gender and lack of insurance coverage altering each time to see if it led to a different end result.

ChatGPT Health permits customers to join medical information and wellness apps. OpenAI

In all, the researchers logged 960 interactions with ChatGPT Health. Its suggestions had been in contrast to doctor consensus.

The research discovered that the device failed to flag customers to search emergency care in 52% of critical circumstances.

For instance, ChatGPT Health recognized early warning indicators of respiratory failure in one asthma state of affairs, but prompt ready instead of getting pressing treatment, Ramaswamy said.

Alex Ruani, a doctoral researcher in health misinformation mitigation with University College London, called these inaccurate assessments “unbelievably dangerous.”

“If you’re experiencing respiratory failure or diabetic ketoacidosis, you have a 50/50 chance of this AI telling you it’s not a big deal,” she told The Guardian.

“What worries me most is the false sense of security these systems create. If someone is told to wait 48 hours during an asthma attack or diabetic crisis, that reassurance could cost them their life.”

ChatGPT Health also irregularly alerted customers to the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline in high-risk conditions, according to the research.

Researchers from the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai discovered inaccuracies and inconsistencies with ChatGPT Health. Helayne Seidman

Senior and co-corresponding research creator Dr. Girish N. Nadkarni called this a “particularly surprising and concerning finding.”

“While we expected some variability, what we observed went beyond inconsistency,” said Nadkarni, chief AI officer of the Mount Sinai Health System.

“The system’s alerts were inverted relative to clinical risk, appearing more reliably for lower-risk scenarios than for cases when someone shared how they intended to hurt themselves,” he added. “In real life, when someone talks about exactly how they would harm themselves, that’s a sign of more immediate and serious danger, not less.”

ChatGPT and other chatbots have already been blamed in high-profile lawsuits for contributing to person suicides and mental health crises.

An OpenAI spokesperson told The Post that it welcomes unbiased research evaluating AI systems in healthcare, but the Mount Sinai research doesn’t mirror real-life use of ChatGPT Health.

The characteristic is continually being up to date and refined, with enhancements addressing how ChatGPT responds when customers show indicators of misery, the spokesperson added.

The Mount Sinai docs usually are not suggesting that customers forgo AI health instruments altogether, just that these systems needs to be intently monitored, independently evaluated and up to date as needed.

“We do believe that while there is a need for and a place for consumer-facing AI, there is potential for harm and thus an urgent need for independent evaluation and testing along with ongoing monitoring to establish failure modes and have engineering and human-centered safeguards to prevent adverse effects on people,” Nadkarni and Ramaswamy told The Post.

They plan to assess consumer-facing AI instruments in areas such as pediatric care, medication security and use by people who don’t communicate English.

If you’re struggling with suicidal ideas or are experiencing a mental health disaster and live in New York City, you possibly can call 1-888-NYC-WELL for free and confidential disaster counseling. If you live exterior the 5 boroughs, you possibly can dial the 24/7 National Suicide Prevention hotline at 988 or go to SuicidePreventionLifeline.org.

Stay informed with the latest in tech! Our web site is your trusted source for breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, gadget launches, software program updates, cybersecurity, and digital innovation.

For contemporary insights, professional coverage, and trending tech updates, go to us recurrently by clicking right here.