OpenAI risks White House relationship with hiring of nuisance AI policy govt: sources | Latest Tech News
Top OpenAI official Dean Ball is in the center of a heated feud with the Trump administration – and White House officers warn that Sam Altman’s firm risked its relationship with the federal government by hiring him for a senior position, The Post has discovered.
Ball infuriated Trump AI officers last month after claiming in an X post that the White House ought to create “regulatory risk” — or new guidelines imposing penalties on US companies — to discourage use of Chinese AI fashions. White House AI czar David Sacks questioned if Ball was “confessing to a regulatory capture strategy” to benefit OpenAI, while Pentagon AI chief Emil Michael slammed Ball as the AI world’s “supreme village idiot.”
The incident was just the latest signal of long-simmering dangerous blood between key White House figures and Ball, who served a four-month stint on Trump’s AI workforce from April to August of last yr. Ball grew to become a vocal critic of Trump’s AI strategy after leaving the administration, even as he billed himself as a key architect of the White House’s high-profile AI Action Plan — a detailed roadmap for how the US might win the AI race.
Dean Ball not too long ago joined OpenAI as its head of strategic futures. Youtube
Three White House officers with direct data of the matter allege that Ball has exaggerated his position on that project. The officers, who requested anonymity to focus on the scenario, described Ball as a “junior-to-mid-level policy analyst” whose concepts have been frequently ignored by decision-makers – and say he never obtained a security clearance, which is needed to take part in high-level discussions.
One of the officers said it was the “most ludicrous assertion imaginable” that Ball performed a senior position in crafting the AI Action Plan.
“Everyone who was actually involved in architecting it is way too nice to say it in frank terms,” the official said. “He was at best a nuisance and at worst irrelevant.”
A source close to Ball pushed back on claims that he exaggerated his work at the White House, noting that a blueprint written by Ball shortly after the 2024 election for the new administration touches on many of the ideas — such as sustaining export controls on AI chips, rewriting the National Institute of Standard and Technology’s AI Risk Management Framework, and building automated labs — that ended up in the AI Action Plan.
Asked for remark, an OpenAI spokesperson pointed to a June 18 tweet by the company’s chief strategy officer Jason Kwon.
“Really glad Dean is joining OpenAI,” Kwon wrote. “He’s spent a lot of time thinking seriously about the biggest questions frontier labs need to get right: risk, governance, frontier policy issues, and what comes next. We won’t always agree on everything, which is a good thing. This is a really important moment for these debates, and we’ll be better for having him pressure-test and shape our thinking.”
Ball’s position can be targeted on research moderately than lobbying or political outreach, the spokesperson added.
‘A little puzzled’
Tensions between Ball and the White House first got here to a head last February during the administration’s high-profile spat with Anthropic – when he grew to become one of the loudest voices defending CEO Dario Amodei’s firm after President Trump ordered federal companies to stop utilizing its fashions.
At the time, Ball called the Pentagon’s resolution to label Anthropic as a supply-chain risk a “psychotic power grab” and “almost certainly illegal.” He also outlined his issues with the Pentagon’s method during an widely-cited interview on “The Ezra Klein Show.”
In a Substack post asserting his hiring as OpenAI’s “head of strategic futures” in June, Ball, 34, wrote that he can be “charged with shaping frontier AI policy,” including “catastrophic risk, recursive self-improvement, labor market impact, and the relationship between the frontier labs, governments (particularly the US federal government), and society.”
Dean Ball spent 4 months working in the Trump administration. Dean Ball
The White House is “a little puzzled by what value OpenAI sees in hiring him” given Ball’s tense relationships with some of his former colleagues, a second administration official said.
Any backlash against Ball might also trigger hassle for OpenAI, which so far has averted the type of public criticism and backlash that its chief rival Anthropic has frequently confronted in its dealings with the Trump administration.
“We want to and continue to work with OpenAI, just given its importance and our other relationships at the firm, including Sam,” the second official said.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman speaks at a panel dialogue on potentials, views and challenges in the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI) at the Technical University (TU) in Berlin on Friday, February 7, 2025. AFP via Getty Images
“But [Ball] isn’t helping, and his idiotic commentary on X about our AI policies that’s rooted in the fake premise that he has an insider perspective into our operations is actively undermining OpenAI. He has and continues to turn a lot of people off.”
The first official added that Ball, who lacks a technical background in AI research or development, was “seen as sort of silly and underinformed” during his time at the White House and often steered concepts that ran afoul of the imaginative and prescient outlined by decision-makers, including Sacks and White House tech adviser Michael Kratsios.
Pentagon AI chief Emil Michael blasted Dean Ball as a “supreme village idiot.” Bloomberg via Getty Images
“The overwhelming consensus on everyone that has worked with him during his time here was that his recommendations were often minimally listened to, and that the sort of ideological and intellectual direction that he was approaching a policy from was extremely contrary to the president’s own priorities about American AI dominance,” the first official added.
On his personal web site, Ball describes himself as a “Senior Policy Advisor for Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technology at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, where he was the primary staff drafter of America’s AI Action Plan.”
“He gets a lot of play around Washington as someone who is in the know when it comes to how the Trump administration is thinking about AI policy when the vast majority of people who are responsible for actually devising and implementing AI policy and who the president actually consults find him to be silly and irrelevant,” the first White House official said.
David Sacks questioned if Dean Ball was “confessing to a regulatory capture strategy.” Getty Images for Hill & Valley Forum
After leaving the White House, Ball labored at the Foundation for American Innovation, a tech-focused Washington, DC, suppose tank, and as a policy fellow at the AI policy nonprofit Fathom. In the past, he labored as a research fellow for the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.
‘Thought leader’ declare
Fathom CEO Andrew Freedman defended Ball in an interview with The Post, describing him as an “intellectual thought leader” whose views on AI policy have been widely read inside the Beltway even before he joined the White House. Freedman asserted that Ball has gained respect — and some enemies — exactly because he’s prepared to communicate actually when he disagrees with the administration.
The OpenAI emblem is seen in an illustration on Thursday, June 11, 2026. (REUTERS) REUTERS
“Anybody who said [Ball] had anything but a very significant role in crafting the White House AI Action Plan is engaging in some pretty hardcore retconning,” he said.
The social media uproar last month centered on Ball’s remarks relating to Kimi K3, an open-source model made by Beijing-based Moonshot AI that claims capabilities related to those of OpenAI and Anthropic.
US officers have been voicing concern about the rise of open-source fashions, that are made out there for a fraction of the price of the closed-source fashions provided by US frontier labs.
In a prolonged X post, Ball argued the long-term success of open-source fashions would lead to “full AI communism.”
“I would guess that the Trump Administration will at some point realize that their best strategy here would be to create large amounts of regulatory risk around the use of open Chinese models,” Ball wrote.
Sacks fired back, writing that Ball’s call for the “weaponization of regulatory uncertainty as a competitive tool should be completely unacceptable.”
The Pentagon’s Michael waded into the fray after Ball asserted that key authorities companies, including the War Department, had “already used ill-justified claims of danger” to block workers from utilizing Chinese AI.
“Dean Ball has perhaps the biggest gap between actual IQ and his own perceived IQ of anyone in the industry (about 40 points),” Michael wrote.
Stay informed with the latest in tech! Our web site is your trusted source for breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, gadget launches, software program updates, cybersecurity, and digital innovation.
For contemporary insights, professional coverage, and trending tech updates, go to us frequently by clicking right here.
