Randy Fine Will Have Dems Whimpering Again As He

Republican Representative Randy Fine (FL-6) has launched the “Protecting Puppies from Sharia Act,” a invoice designed to withhold federal funding from any state or local authorities that bans canine as pets.

Fine’s effort doubles down on his viral declaration that Americans will select canine over radical Islam.

“I am proud to introduce the Protecting Puppies from Sharia Act,” Fine announced on X. “Democrats are losing their minds because I made a simple statement—given a choice between our dogs and those who would ban them, the choice is easy. They can pound sand.” 

The congressman’s post included a playful lil’ pup above the Gadsden flag phrase “Don’t tread on me.”

“In America, we will not allow anyone to tell us that we cannot have dogs,” Fine said. “My bill protects Americans’ right to own a dog and would not allow federal funding to be given to any state or local government that bans them as Haram.”

Haram is an Arabic time period which means “forbidden” or “prohibited” under Islamic law.

“There are 57 countries that are Sharia compliant; the United States will not be the 58th,” Fine concluded.

I’m proud to introduce the Protecting Puppies from Sharia Act.

Democrats are shedding their minds because I made a simple assertion—given a alternative between our canine and those who would ban them, the selection is straightforward.

They can pound sand.

This invoice will ban federal funds to any… pic.twitter.com/KjertyzUJc

— Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) February 19, 2026

READ MORE: Dogs Continue to Win the PR Battle Against Islam by Just Being Dogs

Hot Takes: It’s No Contest, Between a Pro-Palestine Activist and Americans’ Love for Their Dogs

You have to hand it to Fine. This man has some balls (for fetch, of course), contemplating Democrats have spent the last few days attempting to neuter him over feedback he made on social media, saying Muslims could be banned nicely before canine.

“If they force us to choose, the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one,” Fine wrote on X over the weekend.

The feedback had Democrats barking about expulsion and calling his feedback “genocidal.” And their rage might have had some legitimacy if Fine had made the feedback in a vacuum. But he did not, making the left’s fake outrage a joke.

The congressman was responding to Nerdeen Kiswani, a pro-Palestinian activist and loyal lapdog to Democratic Socialist New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who posted that town that never sleeps was “coming to Islam” when it comes to “unclean” canine.

“Finally, NYC is coming to Islam. Dogs definitely have a place in society, just not as indoor pets,” she said. “Like we’ve said all along, they are unclean.” 

Kiswani later claimed her feedback had been a joke. Fine, though, wasn’t shopping for it.

“There’s no reading of it that sounds satirical,” he said. “In Islam, they don’t like dogs … So when a major Muslim leader says we’ve got to get rid of them, you should take them seriously.”

If they pressure us to select, the selection between canine and Muslims will not be a tough one.

— Congressman Randy Fine (@RepFine) February 15, 2026

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (NY-8) naturally leapt at the chance to dishonestly body Fine’s feedback as Islamophobic and demanded GOP members “hold him accountable.”

“Randy Fine is a disgrace to the United States Congress. He is an Islamophobic, disgusting, and unrepentant bigot,” discount basement Obama responded. “Republican leaders must hold this so-called Member of Congress accountable.”

“Political violence, xenophobia, and hate crimes against the Muslim community are on the rise,” he said without evidence. “House Democrats will not let the racist and bigoted behavior of Randy Fine go unchecked.”

Jeffries asserted that a censure, elimination from House committees, or maybe even expulsion could possibly be on the desk for Fine if Democrats win big in the midterms.

Jeffries: Randy Fine is a shame to the United States Congress. He is an Islamophobic, disgusting and unrepentant bigot.

It is unacceptable that Mike Johnson and House Republicans continue to stay silent. Their informal acceptance of hateful and divisive language allows this…

— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) February 18, 2026

I did not have ‘Democrats need to ban canine to appease radical Islam’ on my Bingo card, but right here we’re. No, wait. I truly did have that on my Bingo card. It completely tracks.

Fine, in a dialogue with The Hill, said he’s clearly differentiating between “mainstream Islam” and “radical Islam.” He also teased the possibility of having a furry friend as his guest to the State of the Union.

Woof.

“If a group of people says, ‘Hey, we’ve just shown up in your country, and dogs violate our religion, so you have to stop having them.’ My answer to them is, ‘No, these are our pets. You can go home,” he said.

The congressman will formally introduce the “Protecting Puppies from Sharia Act” on Friday. He reportedly has 4 co-sponsors becoming a member of him in the hassle.

Editor’s Note: Do you get pleasure from PurpleState’s conservative reporting that takes on the novel left and woke media? Support our work so that we will continue to carry you the reality.

Join PurpleState VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership!