Vances Explanation for the GOPs Midterm Disaster

Vice President J.D. Vance has weighed in on Tuesday night time’s bruising election outcomes, claiming in a prolonged X post that the purpose behind the Republican Party’s devastation is that people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in the midterm, and that they did so because they had been dissatisfied with the battle with Iran, the United States’ relationship with Israel, and felt there was a lack of focus on the price of residing/inflation.

Vance said the data analysts on the GOP aspect believed the Trump/Vance 2024 voters was going to end up to vote in the midterm, so the White House was optimistic. But Vance requested “the smartest data guy” he is aware of if that meant the GOP would “shock the world,” that means, buck the pattern that the social gathering holding the White House loses seats in the midterm election. Vance said that, according to that particular person, “the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys.”

One of the issues the data analysts on our aspect obsessed over was “composition”—whether or not the voters regarded close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that confirmed a Democrat blowout, the data saved on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright superb, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a real sense of optimism on our staff: our people had been exhibiting up. So, I requested the smartest data man I do know, does that imply we’re going to shock the world? “No,” he told me. “We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us.” Well, that seems to be prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for instance, the voters was 9 factors more Republican than Democrat, just a couple factors worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there have been locations we may have carried out better on turnout. But the main drawback shouldn’t be turnout. The main drawback is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There might be a lot of infighting and arguing over what occurred and why that is. One of the pollsters I actually respect told me that our financial messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real purpose we misplaced is clear to nearly everybody. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I do know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic poll by 13 factors. I felt adverse going into Tuesday, but even I used to be shocked by this. In his polling, he noticed that a lot of Trump 2024 voters had been offended and planning to vote for Democrats. He requested those voters who had deserted us what would trigger them to come back on our staff. The top 4 solutions, accounting for almost all of the responses had been: 1) End the battle
2) Focus on price of residing/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters confirmed up. And the above 4 causes are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the outcomes. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic decision to the battle, it seems her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great particular person.) In the next few months, there’s going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any quantity of institution politicians say the resolution to our woes is amnesty. I’m open to the concept that we must always change enforcement—by focusing more on companies that rent unlawful labor, for occasion. But anybody pushing amnesty is mendacity to you. The purpose we misplaced is the battle. The president himself said so last night time. If you would like to argue it was value it, that dropping the Senate for the next 6 years was value it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile price to pay. Agree or disagree, that’s at least sincere. But everybody is aware of why we misplaced. And any sincere dialog about where we go from right here must start there. I stay hopeful about our nation. To the people who are pissed off and need to say, “I told you so”: you’re proper, you probably did inform us so. Take that power into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the outcomes, try to be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our nation.

— JD Vance (@JDVance) November 4, 2026

He then said that “another pollster – one of the smartest people I know in politics – told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points.” And would not ya realize it, that unnamed pollster also discovered that Trump/Vance 2024 voters had been dissatisfied and had been going to vote for Democrats, but this pollster gave Vance a handy checklist of issues ballot respondents said would make them vote for the GOP again. That checklist:

1. End the battle
2. Focus on price of residing/inflation
3. Put America First
4. Change our relationship to Israel

Vance concluded that, “The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.” Yes, in a late-night call to Fox News’ election desk, President Trump did say that the Iran battle contributed to last night time’s losses, but he also positioned a lot of blame on candidates who did not do enough to help themselves or did not know how to inform a compelling story about why people ought to vote for them.

President Trump told Fox News the Iran battle contributed to Republican losses as Democrats seized control of Congress in the midterms, saying ‘I believe a half of it was Iran’ https://t.co/6Jqz0elgMj https://t.co/E14tcaIaq4

— GWN (@GWN) November 4, 2026

That’s not to say that the battle in Iran wasn’t a major issue, or that price of residing (particularly at the pump) wasn’t a major issue. According to exit polls, those had been the points most cited by voters as the purpose for their vote. But it is not that they had been completely against the battle with Iran; they had been against the size and the sustained high fuel costs (emphasis mine):

For all of the issues that might be written about this election, the backside line is that Trump waged the sort of battle he said he would not get into — one that is dragging on, raising fuel costs and piling on people who had been already feeling the pinch — and now he’s paying the price.

In Vance’s estimation, the GOP has misplaced the Senate for six years as a outcome of this election — which may end up being true, but is a very daring prediction to make today — and blames that on people who supported taking out the mullahs, many of whom aren’t neocons. There’s a strong core of Gen X conservatives who have needed the mullahs dealt with for a very long time, in large half because of how many members of our technology had been killed, maimed, or endure from debilitating PTSD because of Iran’s assist of terrorism for the last 47 years.

If you would like to argue it was value it, that dropping the Senate for the next 6 years was value it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile price to pay. Agree or disagree, that’s at least sincere.

Even assuming that the data and polling confirmed these numbers and outcomes (now we have no manner to test his assertions), to consider that the takeaway is that we should not have bombed Iran or taken motion to stop them from having a nuclear weapon is absurd. The drawback is that Trump told us in February that the battle would only last for 4 to six weeks, and right here we’re in November still paying astronomical costs for fuel and seemingly without a plan or an end date.

If the Vice President needs to blame the electoral losses on the battle, then he ought to take some duty for the messaging, and for the failed ceasefire, which had the impact of just dragging issues out.

Likewise, it appears that Vance is blaming the considerations about price of residing and inflation on the battle, which is simplistic. Yes, fuel costs soared this 12 months because of it, but there’s a heck of a lot more to that story, and the Republicans in charge — including Vance — did a piss-poor job of telling it, and have carried out a dangerous job with it since the administration took workplace, beginning with tariffs. As Spencer Pratt said today, in an insightful thread on X:

It is 100% true that all the pieces’s too rattling costly, and we all know that inflated costs are always sticky. Does anybody know that it is fully the outcome of shutting down the global financial system over the flu and (both naive republicans and democrats) printing infinity {dollars} for a number of years? Nope…because no one has successfully told that story, and it is an unsexy story to inform. 

With projected growth of 5%, the financial system proper now is stronger than it has been in generations. Is that the story you hear? Nope. Is that the vibe you’re feeling? Absolutely not, particularly when every time you fill up your fuel tank, it seems like a diesel enema.

At the end of his post, Vance said that he remained hopeful about our nation and urged people who are offended about the election outcomes to channel that anger into the work of saving our nation. On that, we are able to all agree.

Editor’s Note: Do you get pleasure from RedState’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical Left and woke media? Support our work so that we are able to continue to deliver you the reality.

Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to obtain 60% off your membership.