Supreme Court Sides With Trump on Removal of FTC

The Trump administration hasn’t been catching as many court-related breaks of late, with a quantity of hostile rulings in the decrease courts. However, on Monday, the Supreme Court once again sided with the administration on the issue of the removing of “independent” company leaders. 

This is the second win for the administration in as many weeks in the case styled Slaughter v. Trump. On September 8, the court issued an administrative (non permanent) keep of a district court order granting abstract judgment in favor of plaintiff Rebecca Slaughter, who challenged her March 2025 removing as a commissioner from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Now, the court has formally granted the administration’s utility for keep (treating it like a petition for certiorari) and set oral argument for December. 

RELATED: Supreme Court Hands Trump a Second Win – This One on Removal of Agency Leaders

NEW: Just Fired FTC Commissioner Loses His Mind, Accuses Trump of Breaking the Law

Slaughter and another commissioner, Alvaro Bedoya, both filed swimsuit to problem their removing. However, in June, Bedoya notified the court he was resigning from his place as FTC commissioner so that he might pursue other (gainful) employment. In July, Judge Loren AliKhan (a Biden appointee) issued an order dismissing Bedoya’s claims without prejudice (as moot) and granting abstract judgment in favor of Slaughter and enjoining the defendants “from removing Ms. Slaughter from her lawful position as an FTC Commissioner or otherwise interfering with Ms. Slaughter’s right to perform her lawful duties as an FTC Commissioner until the expiration of her term or unless she is lawfully removed by the President for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office” pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 41.”

The administration appealed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and sought a keep of Judge AliKhan’s order. While the D.C. Circuit initially entered an administrative (non permanent) keep, on September 2, it denied the administration’s movement for keep pending appeal and ordered the executive keep dissolved.

The administration then filed an utility for keep with the Supreme Court on September 4, and the court then issued an order administratively staying the case, adopted by today’s ruling. 

The Supreme Court on Monday backed President Donald Trump’s choice to fire a commissioner on the Federal Trade Commission, sending yet another signal that the high court intends to revisit a 90-year-old court precedent about government firing energy.

The non permanent choice to preserve Biden-appointed commissioner Rebecca Slaughter’s termination was issued 6-3 along ideological traces. The Supreme Court set oral arguments in the case for December.

The court’s order on the matter was temporary and per curiam (by the court/unsigned), but Justice Elena Kagan penned a temporary dissent, in which Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined. 

Ahead of the December argument, the court instructed the events to temporary the next questions:

(1) Whether the statutory removing protections for members of the Federal Trade Commission violate the separation of powers and, if so, whether or not Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U. S. 602 (1935), must be overruled.

(2) Whether a federal court could forestall a individual’s removing from public workplace, either through aid at equity or at law.

Along with its Monday ruling in Slaughter, the court denied the plaintiffs’ petitions for certiorari before judgment in two companion/associated circumstances: Harris v. Bessent (removing of Merit Systems Protection Board member) and Wilcox v. Trump (removing of National Labor Relations Board member). 

Editor’s Note: Radical leftist judges are doing the whole lot they’ll to hamstring President Trump’s agenda to make America great again.

Help us maintain these corrupt judges accountable for their unconstitutional rulings. Join RedState VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.