Amaal Mallik questions blaming violent films for | Indian movie News

Trending

Amaal Mallik questions blaming violent films for | Indian Movie News


Singer and music composer Amaal Mallik has shared his views on the talk surrounding violent films and their alleged affect on people, following the horrific assault on a Class 10 pupil in Andhra Pradesh. The incident concerned a 21-year-old man named Hemanth, who attacked the coed with an electric chainsaw after she rejected his advances.

Following the incident, some people have questioned whether or not violent films, significantly those made by filmmaker Sandeep Reddy Vanga, encourage such behaviour. Reacting to the dialogue, Amaal took to X (previously Twitter) and said that while films and music can affect younger minds, cinema alone can’t be held accountable for an particular person’s actions.

“I understand why people are concerned. Films and music can influence young people, and some kids copy what they see. Filmmakers should think about how they show violence. But cinema alone cannot be blamed for someone’s actions,” Amaal wrote.

He identified that household values, upbringing, the political climate, personal experiences and an particular person’s approach of pondering also play a position. However, he made it clear that none of these components can ever justify violence. Strongly condemning the Andhra Pradesh incident, he added, “I would never support anyone going into a school, college or any other place to kill someone with a chainsaw. It is horrifying and completely wrong.”

The singer also said that he has loved films like Animal, Kabir Singh, Dhurandhar and KGF, while admitting that he has had points with sure scenes in some motion pictures. He believes audiences ought to perceive that a movie is a story and all the things shown on screen need not be imitated in real life.

I perceive why people are involved. Films and music can affect younger people, and some youngsters copy what they see. Filmmakers ought to assume about how they show violence.
But cinema alone can’t be blamed for somebody’s actions. Family values, upbringing, the political climate in different states, and the way in which each individual thinks and reacts all matter.

People’s experiences and trauma can have an effect on them too. Everyone has good and dangerous in them, but none of this excuses violence.

I might never help anybody going into a college, school or any other place to kill somebody with a chainsaw. It is horrifying and fully improper.

The assault in Andhra Pradesh deserves a critical dialogue, but we must always not assume that one movie, track or filmmaker brought about it.

I’ve loved Animal, Kabir Singh, Dhurandhar, KGF and many other films, but I’ve also had issues with some scenes.

A movie is a story, and we must always know that we wouldn’t have to copy all the things we see. Many people work together to make a movie. These are latest examples too.

If social media and today’s ethical policing had existed in the 70s, 80s and 90s, people would have discovered a lot to criticise in films from those years as effectively.

Age scores must be adopted. Parents shouldn’t carry infants to films rated -A. We can take the affect of films severely while also anticipating viewers to perceive the distinction between a story and real life.

If we criticise films, we must be truthful and look at songs too. Ban songs like Kar Gayi Chull, Rom Rom Romantic (both my songs), Beedi Jalaile, Pink Lips and Chikni Chameli, Munni Badnaam, why are they celebrated and used on actuality exhibits ??

There are also so many songs and content items outdoors of films, specifically rap music obtainable on YouTube and Instagram, particularly from the northern belt, about homicide, energy and aggression. Some songs call girls “items” or discuss about choosing up women. Parents play these songs around their youngsters and encourage them to dance to them.

It’s an artwork type, and we all can go proper or improper sometimes, but it’s a bloody imaginative space.

If you’re getting so influcned by a movie you’re the idiot.

If every movie, track or show with violence or questionable content is blamed for people’s actions, then ban Pushpa, KGF, Latent and other comedy exhibits

Why don’t we all change into the ethical police and ban all the things? Cinema can affect people, but it isn’t the only purpose somebody commits a crime.

— Amaal Mallik (@AmaalMallik) November 4, 2026

Amaal additional questioned why the criticism is basically directed at films while songs with questionable lyrics and themes continue to be celebrated. Interestingly, he named some of his own tracks, including ‘Kar Gayi Chull’ and ‘Rom Rom Romantic’, along with ‘Beedi Jalaile’, ‘Pink Lips’, ‘Chikni Chameli’ and ‘Munni Badnaam’, asking why such songs are featured on actuality exhibits.

He also pointed in direction of rap music and other content obtainable on YouTube and Instagram that glorifies homicide, energy and aggression or makes use of objectionable references to girls. Questioning the double requirements, he said that if films are being criticised for their content, songs ought to also be examined pretty.

Amaal called for age scores to be adopted, significantly asking mother and father not to take infants to films licensed ‘A’. He concluded that while leisure can affect people, blaming one movie, track or filmmaker for a crime is unfair. As he put it, “Cinema can influence people, but it is not the only reason someone commits a crime.”

When somebody commits a heinous crime, the first response must be empathy & an attempt to perceive the bigger downside. Not discovering a handy scapegoat in cinema.
It is changing into more and more clear that your concern will not be for the victims or their households, but that you are utilizing a horrific tragedy as a soiled excuse to settle your personal scores.
This is very directed at those failed annoyed jobless male/feminine actors, few administrators, producers & parasites, who immediately appoint themselves as social reformers whenever an alternative arises to take a dig at another person’s work.
A tragedy deserves empathy 🙏, not opportunism. Learn the distinction.

— Sandeep Reddy Vanga (@imvangasandeep) November 4, 2026

Earlier in the day, Sandeep Reddy Vanga also reacted to the controversy. In a post shared on X, he wrote, “When someone commits a heinous crime, the first response should be empathy & an attempt to understand the larger problem. Not finding a convenient scapegoat in cinema. It is becoming increasingly clear that your concern is not for the victims or their families, but that you’re using a horrific tragedy as a dirty excuse to settle your personal scores. This is especially directed at those failed frustrated jobless male/female actors, few directors, producers & parasites, who suddenly appoint themselves as social reformers whenever an opportunity arises to take a dig at someone else’s work. A tragedy deserves empathy 🙏, not opportunism. Learn the difference.”

Also Read: Amaal Mallik warns trolls amid ‘Main Hoon Hero Tera’ credit controversy: “Music ka SRK hoon, magar gussa mera Salman Khan wala hai”

Amaal Mallik questions blaming violent films for | Watch Online Free

Stay in the know with the latest trending topics! Visit our web site daily for the freshest movie news and content, expertly curated to keep you entertained and informed.

- Advertisement -
img
- Advertisement -

Latest News

- Advertisement -

More Related Content

- Advertisement -