Delhi HC examines validity of Sunjay Kapur will | Indian Movie News
A recent layer of legal complexity has emerged in the continuing inheritance dispute over the estimated Rs 30,000 crores property of late industrialist Sunjay Kapur, with senior advocates questioning the validity of the Will produced by his third spouse, Priya Kapur, on grounds of non-compliance with probate necessities and absence of executor consent.
During proceedings on December 10, 2025, counsel representing Sunjay Kapur’s youngsters, Samaira and Kiaan Kapur, argued before the Delhi High Court that the alleged Will suffers from structural and legal infirmities that transcend procedural lapses. At the centre of the problem is the conduct of the named executor, Shradha Suri Marwah, who, according to the Will’s own clauses, was required to immediately assume custody of the property’s property and provoke probate proceedings following Kapur’s death.
Senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani contended that neither step was taken. “Defendant no. 4 has acted in complete dereliction of the alleged Will,” he submitted, mentioning that no probate has been sought and no property have been taken under the executor’s control, despite the doc making probate a necessary requirement. Clause 3 of the Will, he argued, leaves no discretion on the matter.
The issue was additional sophisticated by a June 24, 2025 communication in which Suri reportedly wrote to Priya Kapur, asking her to provoke probate proceedings. According to the kids’s counsel, this correspondence implicitly acknowledges that the legal obligation to search probate lay with the executor herself. They preserve that this contradiction undermines the doc’s credibility and raises questions about whether or not the Will was ever supposed to be acted upon as claimed.
Adding to the problem is Suri’s earlier assertion that she had no prior data of being appointed executor until she allegedly acquired an electronic mail from Dinesh Agarwal, a witness to the purported Will. Jethmalani argued that under settled law, an executor can’t be appointed without consent or at least prior session, calling the shortage of such consent a “serious red flag” in the Will’s execution and presentation.
Legal specialists echoed these considerations. Bombay High Court lawyer Rahul R. Shelke said the inconsistencies strike at the basis of enforceability. “If a Will mandates probate and custodial transfer and the executor ignores both, the court is entitled to question whether the Will existed in the manner claimed. You cannot selectively rely on a Will—either it is followed in full or its credibility collapses,” he famous.
Alongside questions over probate, the kids’s counsel also pressed the court to appoint an unbiased administrator to safeguard Sunjay Kapur’s abroad property until the Will’s validity is conclusively decided. Jethmalani warned that without court oversight, overseas property might be offered, refinanced or in any other case dealt with, doubtlessly dragging the events into a number of abroad legal battles.
“There should be a receiver or an administrator appointed for Sunjay’s assets. If this Will is used overseas, we could be forced to litigate in several jurisdictions,” he told the court, stressing that in contrast to home property, overseas holdings will be moved or encumbered with little real-time supervision.
Sunjay Kapur’s worldwide portfolio reportedly consists of residential properties in New York and the United Kingdom, as effectively as overseas-linked investments related to Aureus Investments Pvt Ltd. According to the kids’s aspect, possession claims to these property presently relaxation on the disputed Will.
Senior advocate Pratik Thadani noticed that ambiguity turns into significantly dangerous when overseas property are concerned. “It is neither wise nor equitable to leave control with a single beneficiary when a Will is under challenge and executor obligations remain unfulfilled. Appointing an independent administrator is not about choosing sides but about protecting the estate until the court reaches a final view,” he said.
The concern, as outlined before the court, is that once transactions based on an unverified Will happen overseas, they might be tough or inconceivable to reverse, even if an Indian court later rejects the doc. For Samaira and Kiaan Kapur, the demand for an administrator is positioned as a protecting measure to protect the property and guarantee that the ultimate adjudication just isn’t rendered meaningless by irreversible cross-border actions.
As the Delhi High Court continues to scrutinise the alleged Will, the dispute now hinges not just on signatures and witnesses, but on whether or not the doc was ever acted upon in the way the law requires.
Also Read: Priya Kapur’s ‘position swap’ defence faces major setback in Sunjay Kapur Will case: Court flags energy grab, lacking attachment and “suspicious suppression”
Delhi HC examines validity of Sunjay Kapur will | Watch Online Free
Stay in the know with the latest trending topics! Visit our web site daily for the freshest movie news and content, expertly curated to keep you entertained and informed.
