Netanyahu shares Trumps foreboding comment on | Political News

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared on Fox News with host Sean Hannity on Monday night after Israel and the U.S. launched dead-of-night missile strikes against Iran, initiating a region-wide battle that President Donald Trump said would doubtless take a number of weeks and lead to American casualties.

During the interview, Netanyahu recalled a dialog with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago resort that he said befell prior to his second presidential inauguration. At the time, Trump had just ended his run on the marketing campaign path, in which he explicitly marketed himself as an anti-war candidate and decried earlier U.S. presidents’ international insurance policies that led to prolonged conflicts in the Middle East.

“The first factor that Donald Trump said to me, he said, ‘You know, we’ve got to stop Iran from getting nukes,'” Netanyahu claimed on Monday. “As simple as that. He said that because he saw that as a clear and present danger to the security and well-being of the United States.”

His look on the right-wing news community comes after Israel and the U.S. killed Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khameneinand amid the shortage of any obvious exit plan for the battle. Israeli ambassadors have said the battle will continue “as long as it takes” and that Israel is preserving “all options on the table,” including a potential ground invasion of Lebanon, according to The Associated Press.

Social media commenters had been fast to criticize Netanyahu’s look on the mainstream Republican tv community, a potential reflection of current polling by The Washington Post that has discovered more U.S. adults oppose the initial airstrikes.

“Yes, Donnie gets excited when his Boss is on TV,” one X consumer wrote in response to a post that included a screenshot of Trump’s Truth Social post encouraging his followers to watch the Hannity interview.

“Trump letting us know his boss will be on Fox News tonight,” another wrote.

“Gee, can’t wait to hear what the murderer has to say,” a third said, presumably referring to the United Nations, International Criminal Court and other global humanitarian teams that have categorized Netanyahu’s multi-year assault on Palestinians in Gaza as a genocide.

Though Trump has carried out an about-face in phrases of his army aggression — having ordered more army strikes against more international locations than any other president in the trendy period of the United States — Netanyahu’s comment, if correct, reveals that Trump undermined his own claims of being a “peace” candidate even before taking workplace.

His anti-war feedback on the marketing campaign path had been echoed by some of his closest allies.

Vice President JD Vance headlined an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal in 2023 as, “Trump’s Best Foreign Policy? Not Starting Any Wars.” Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, meanwhile, bought “No War with Iran” shirts in 2020. In 2024, she said: “A vote for Donald Trump is a vote to end wars, not start them,” Axios reported.

On the 2024 marketing campaign path, Trump himself decried earlier U.S. presidents’ international insurance policies that led to prolonged conflicts in the Middle East. “These globalists want to squander all of America’s strength, blood and treasure, chasing monsters and phantoms overseas while keeping us distracted from the havoc they’re creating here at home,” he said.

Americans’ initial reactions to Trump ordering airstrikes against Iran over the weekend seem more detrimental than optimistic, according to the new snap ballot from the Post that was carried out via textual content message on Sunday.

About half of those polled opposed the strikes, while 39% had been in assist. Roughly 1 in 10 had been not sure. Democrats and independents drove a lot of the disapproval, with practically 9 in 10 Democrats and about 6 in 10 independents opposed to the army strikes, AP reported.

Republicans had been a lot more supportive, with 81% backing the army motion. About 1 in 10 Republicans had been opposed, and a related share had been not sure.

These findings come as American sympathies in the Middle East have shifted dramatically toward the Palestinians, according to new Gallup polling, after many years of overwhelming assist for the Israelis.

That shift accelerated during the warfare in Gaza. Three years in the past, 54% of Americans sympathized more with the Israelis, in contrast with 31% for the Palestinians.

Now, their assist is about evenly balanced, with 41% saying their sympathies lie more with the Palestinians, and only 36% saying the same about the Israelis, the AP reported.

The numbers mirror how assist for Israel has grow to be deeply contentious in the U.S., with profound implications for American politics and international coverage. The altering sentiment has been largely pushed by Democrats, who are now a lot more doubtless to sympathize with Palestinians. U.S. help to Israel has been a major dividing line in the social gathering’s primaries this 12 months.

Gallup’s data signifies that the shift was already taking place before Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, then elevated during Israel’s subsequent army operations in Gaza. The polling has a margin of error of plus or minus 4 proportion factors, which means sentiment toward Israelis and Palestinians is roughly even.