Schumers Open Mouth, Insert Foot Moment as

Democrats have been dropping their minds over President Donald Trump’s actions in Venezuela to seize and arrest the dictator Nicolás Maduro, who was needed in the United States and had been under indictment for 5 years.

We noticed Democrats calling it unlawful and claiming that Trump needed Congressional approval to impact Maduro’s arrest. Their hypocrisy is one thing else, given the actions taken by Democrats like Barack Obama in the past. 

READ MORE: Hot Takes: Trump’s Middle of the Night Op Is Giving the Democrats Heartburn

Do they recall how many civilians Barack Obama in overseas international locations reportedly took out with his drone actions, which led to some referring to him as the Droner-in-Chief?

Obama embraced the US drone programme, overseeing more strikes in his first yr than Bush carried out during his complete presidency. A complete of 563 strikes, largely by drones, focused Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen during Obama’s two phrases, in contrast to 57 strikes under Bush. Between 384 and 807 civilians had been killed in those international locations, according to experiences logged by the Bureau.

Do they recall Obama’s actions in Libya that went on for months without Congressional approval? They even had ABC questioning his actions. Can anybody overlook this? 

Obama and Clinton didn’t search congressional authorization to wage an 8-month long battle in Libya.

“We came, we saw, he died,” they chortled as they violated the War Powers Resolution.

pic.twitter.com/3zBxL2YYp8

— Bluesky Libs (@BlueskyLibs) January 3, 2026

“We came, we saw, he died,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton laughed. 

Imagine the hypocrisy it takes to criticize Trump, after those sorts of actions by a Democrat. 

But maybe the Democrat who most inserted his foot into his mouth was Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), who was mad that he hadn’t been told before the motion. 

Schumer: I used to be in the SCIF on three different events as just lately as, December, and I requested the administration, are you pursuing regime change? Are you intent on taking army motion in Venezuela? Venezuelan territory? And they assured me that they weren’t pursuing those…

— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) January 3, 2026

Schumer: I used to be in the SCIF on three different events as just lately as December, and I requested the administration, are you pursuing regime change? Are you intent on taking army motion in Venezuela? Venezuelan territory? And they assured me that they weren’t pursuing those issues. Clearly, they are not being straight with the American people.

Wait, what, Chuck? What did you just say? Did he just speak about what was said in the SCIF? 

And you marvel why you were not told? It was extremely important for operational security to give you the chance to pull this off, to keep this close to the vest. And if you are speaking about what was said in the SCIF, there’s a drawback. 

People immediately called it out. 

Nothing says you’re taking national security critically like publicizing conversations you say you had in a SCIF. https://t.co/LDFR7Q95fE

— Brendan Carr (@BrendanCarrFCC) January 3, 2026

Schumer disclosing labeled conversations to argue that he ought to have been told more in those labeled conversations. https://t.co/M5p85qGBLM

— Brent Scher (@BrentScher) January 3, 2026

Democrats aren’t only extremely hypocritical, but they do not have a leg to stand on right here. 

Editor’s Note: Do you get pleasure from PinkState’s conservative reporting that takes on the unconventional left and woke media? Support our work so that we will continue to carry you the reality.

Join PinkState VIP and use the promo code FIGHT to obtain 60% off your membership.