Ticketmaster parent Live Nation strikes deal with…
Ticketmaster parent company Live Nation has reportedly struck a tentative settlement with the Department of Justice that may permit it to keep away from a breakup amid allegations it managed an unlawful monopoly that allowed it to “suffocate the competition.”
However, some of the states in the bipartisan group that accused the 2010 Ticketmaster-Live Nation merger of main to exorbitant ticket costs for Taylor Swift followers and other concertgoers have signaled that they plan to refuse the settlement and continue the trial.
Judge Arun Subramanian on Monday blasted both events concerned in the tentative deal, saying no one had informed him of the settlement until late Sunday – even though a time period sheet for the potential settlement was signed Thursday.
“It’s entirely unacceptable,” he fumed.
Ticketmaster and Live Nation Entertainment, based in Beverly Hills, California, have a long historical past of clashes with major artists and their followers, including Taylor Swift and Bruce Springsteen. Getty Images for TAS Rights Management
Live Nation and the Department of Justice didn’t immediately reply to The Post’s requests for remark.
A senior DOJ official told the Associated Press that the proposed settlement would decrease ticket costs, calling it a “win-win for everybody” that would convey quick reduction to customers.
Live Nation will create a $280 million settlement fund, and the company would also be compelled to divest itself of at least 13 exclusive reserving agreements with amphitheaters across the nation.
All owned and operated amphitheaters will continue to be operated by the company as open venues, according to Live Nation.
“Live Nation is proud to lead the way enhancing this experience with our amphitheaters, which will be open to all promoters, allowing these promoters to decide how best to distribute up to 50% of the tickets, and capping ticketing service fees at 15%,” said Live Nation President and CEO Michael Rapino.
“By giving artists greater flexibility in choosing their promotional partners and ticketing strategy while also keeping the cost of a concert more affordable for fans, we are putting more power where it should be – with artists and fans,” added Rapino.
Judge Arun Subramanian, shown in a courtroom sketch drawing in 2024, was indignant no one informed him of the tentative deal until late Sunday even though a time period sheet for a potential settlement was signed on Thursday. Jane Rosenberg
The deal would come with a $280 million effective on Live Nation, and the company would also be compelled to divest itself of at least 13 ampitheaters across the nation, the official told the outlet.
An unspecified double-digit quantity of states are anticipated to signal on to the deal, the official said – though many others are planning to shun the offer.
“For years, Live Nation has made enormous profits by exploiting its illegal monopoly and raising costs for shows,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a assertion Monday.
“The settlement recently announced with the US Department of Justice fails to address the monopoly at the center of this case, and would benefit Live Nation at the expense of consumers. We cannot agree to it.”
New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a assertion the Justice Department deal “fails to address the monopoly at the center of this case” and that she wouldn’t agree to it. AP
The attorneys common of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming and DC also plan to continue the lawsuit, according to James.
The lawsuit – filed under the Biden administration in 2024 – has accused Live Nation of utilizing threats and retaliation to “suffocate the competition” by controlling nearly every facet of the live leisure industry.
Live Nation and Ticketmaster use long-term contracts to forestall venues from switching to rivals and threaten venues that they may lose followers – and income – if they swap to another leisure supplier, according to the go well with.
The ticketing giant, meanwhile, has denied these claims, arguing its ticket costs are set by music artists and their management.
Adam Gitlin, a lawyer for the District of Columbia, told the decide that a number of states – including Texas, Florida and Louisiana – haven’t yet determined whether or not to settle for the deal.
Texas, in explicit, had expressed “serious concerns” around the character of the settlement, Gitlin added.
He requested a mistrial on Monday, but David Marriott, a lawyer for Live Nation, opposed the request.
Judge Subramanian told jurors that “certain states are proceeding” with their claims against the company and that the trial would resume next week.
We present you with the trending topics. Get the best latest Entertainment news and content on our web site daily.
