Priya Kapur’s ‘position swap’ defence faces major | Indian Movie News
The battle over the late industrialist Sunjay Kapur’s Will, has already turn into one of the most intently watched legal disputes contemplating its connection to Sunjay’s kids with actress Karisma Kapoor, Samaira and Kiaan. It has additional intensified in the Delhi High Court as new arguments solid doubt on the credibility of Priya Kapur’s defence.
Senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, representing Samaira and Kiaan, dismantled Priya Kapur’s long-standing declare that her 2023 exit from Automotive India Pvt Ltd (AIPL) was a consensual “position swap” with Sunjay. Instead, he described her elimination on 31 May 2023 as a direct fallout of marital discord—arguing that company filings reveal she neither grew to become Managing Director of Raghuvanshi Investment Pvt Ltd (RIPL) nor held any function in the company.
According to Jethmalani, “Priya was never made the MD of RIPL… She was removed from AIPL,” countering her assertions of a easy company restructuring. The absence of any parallel appointment, he said, undermines her narrative of a steady blended household and seamless transition—an particularly related level given her repeated references to cordial ties with Karisma Kapoor’s kids.
What adopted Sunjay’s death in June 2023 is now under even sharper scrutiny. Records introduced in court show Priya was appointed as a director of AIPL a day after his passing, and reinstated herself as Managing Director within a week. Jethmalani argued this mirrored not continuity, but opportunism: “She was not in control when Sunjay was alive. She sought control only after his passing.”
The company timeline, the plaintiffs argue, aligns too conveniently with the sudden look of a contested Will—a doc central to figuring out the legal rights of Sunjay’s heirs, including Karisma’s kids.
Complicating issues additional is the conduct of the named executor Shradha Suri Marwah, who, according to submissions, neither pursued probate nor took charge of Sunjay’s belongings as required. Jethmalani contended that an executor can’t selectively implement components of a Will. The court was also told that Shradha claimed to have “deleted” a essential electronic mail attachment containing the alleged Will—despite the e-mail itself being produced in court.
“You cannot delete the attachment without deleting the email,” Jethmalani argued, highlighting what he described as an “impossible explanation” and pointing to the suspicious disappearance of a supporting doc that appeared in an earlier electronic mail but not in the ultimate model.
With the matter listed again for December 22, the court will continue to study inconsistencies around Priya’s company function, post-death actions, and the lacking attachment—points that now lie at the center of a dispute carrying important implications for Sunjay Kapur’s kids, his legacy, and the companies he once helmed.
Also Read: Karisma Kapoor renews Rs 66 lakhs Bandra house lease amid battle over Sunjay Kapur’s Rs 30,000-crores property: Report
Priya Kapur’s ‘position swap’ defence faces major | Watch Online Free
Stay in the know with the latest trending topics! Visit our web site daily for the freshest movie news and content, expertly curated to keep you entertained and informed.
