"Samaira and Kiaan being robbed of everything | Indian Movie News
The inheritance dispute within the Kapur household has escalated sharply after Mandhira Kapur launched a pointed assault on her late brother Sunjay Kapur’s widow, Priya Sachdev Kapur. Speaking on the podcast InControversial with Pooja Chadhuri, Mandhira called the continuing state of affairs “major theft. Major fraud. Pure robbery,” as she questioned the legitimacy of the Will introduced before the Delhi High Court.
Mandhira claimed Priya demanded confidentiality at every step of the method. “You wanted an NDA. You wanted the Will in a sealed envelope. And now you don’t want a forensic. What are you hiding? How many games are we going to play?” she said, alleging that makes an attempt had been made to keep essential info from the household.
She added that she intends to contest the matter fully: “As far as I go, I’m going to fight this till the end. Who is she not to pay the tuition fees, dude? It’s not her money that she’s claimed it. This is pure robbery. This is what you call major theft. This is what you call major fraud. And this country needs to wake up and see it.”
According to Mandhira, her mom, Rani Kapur, was requested to signal paperwork “behind closed doors” shortly after Sunjay’s death. “My mother doesn’t know what she signed. She was overwhelmed, grieving and vulnerable. This family has been ripped off everything that belongs to us.”
Mandhira argued that the household’s function in building the Kapur legacy is being overwritten. “There is a family in which there were five of us who built this with dad. You can’t cut us off.”
Accusations of bloodline erasure
One of Mandhira’s strongest objections issues the way in which the Will identifies Sunjay’s kids. “Safira has been called the daughter (in the Will). Samaira is the daughter — not Safira. Safira is the stepdaughter. Her biological father (Vikram Chatwal) is alive,” she said.
The Will reportedly names Priya and her two kids — Safira and Azarius — while leaving out Sunjay’s organic kids, Samaira and Kiaan. “Nobody is denying that my brother cared for Safira,” Mandhira added. “But don’t take over when Samaira is there. Don’t name Safira ‘the daughter.’ She is the stepdaughter. Stop rewriting lineage.”
Her issues align with arguments raised by senior counsel Mahesh Jethmalani before the Delhi High Court, who questioned the inconsistencies and “digitally suspicious” nature of the Will.
Digital metadata under highlight
Jethmalani earlier told the court that the doc didn’t originate from Sunjay’s devices. Instead, metadata indicated it was created on the pc of Nitin Sharma, a Sona BLW worker with no personal connection to the Kapur household.
“Who prepared this Will?” he requested, highlighting that it was created and modified on 17 March—when Sunjay was in Goa with his son, Kiaan.
Mandhira echoed this concern: “You’re on holiday with your child — and simultaneously disinheriting him? Stop insulting our intelligence.”
The digital path reveals that the file was scanned and transformed to PDF on 24 March at 10:06 a.m., moments before a WhatsApp group titled Family Office IC was created, including Priya, Sharma and aide Dinesh Agarwal. A senior household affiliate described the sequence as “the theatre of grief, not the truth of it.”
A deeper sample, says the household
Mandhira recalled an earlier incident involving her father: “There was a fight in my house one day with my dad and my brother, where my dad very clearly told him in Delhi. But he said to her, I will never look at her. I never want her around me. She’s not welcome into my house. Today you’ve taken over the damn house.”
She added that the Will is an element of a broader shift in control. After Sunjay’s passing, the Kapur title was eliminated from the Sona BLW promoter group within one quarter. “My brother led the legacy. He didn’t create the wealth — my father did,” she said.
Mandhira also claimed that Sunjay himself never meant for Priya to control any half of the Sona Group. She referenced Priya’s earlier removing from the board of AIPL in May 2023, adopted by her return in 2025. “When you hear the whispers going around, you’ll understand what’s going on… I mean, the whispers are very clear that there was problems in the marriage.”
“Priya should be ashamed to be walking around representing our family. This is our estate. Our inheritance,” she added.
She also said that her mom can no longer enter their Rajokri home, despite building it “brick by brick.” “My mother sat under a tree supervising the labourers. Today, she cannot even enter her own home.”
Criticism of aides and isolation of the household
Mandhira criticised long-time aides Dinesh Agarwal and Nitin Sharma: “They are little Priya’s puppets,” she said. “I grew up around them. They worked for my father. Where is their loyalty? Shame on them.”
She added that both have cut off all communication with the household. “This family has been cut off from everything. It’s intentional. It’s strategic.”
Impact on the kids
Mandhira emphasised the implications for Sunjay’s first two kids. “Those two kids, Samaira and Kiaan — they’ve lost their best friend. And now they’re being robbed of everything that is rightfully theirs.” She also accused Priya of withholding basic bills: “Who is she not to pay the school fees? It’s not her money. This is major theft. Major fraud.”
Possibility of settlement
Despite the continuing battle, Mandhira said there’s a path to decision. “If everything my mother signed post-2017 is shown to my sister and our lawyers, they will sit at the table.” Until then, she insists: “I will not let her take my father’s legacy away. I will fight till the end.”
Also Read: Karisma Kapoor’s youngsters push for forensic review of Sunjay Kapur’s will; court seeks rationalization from Priya Sachdev
"Samaira and Kiaan being robbed of everything | Watch Online Free
Stay in the know with the latest trending topics! Visit our web site daily for the freshest movie news and content, expertly curated to keep you entertained and informed.
